Soalan-soalan untuk Sessi Parlimen mulai pada 19 Oktober 2009
Soalan-soalan untuk jawapan lisan
– Questions for oral answers –
1. YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] minta Menteri Kementerian Sains, Teknologu dan Innovasi menyatakan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dan akan diambil terhadap Venturepharm Asia Sdn Bhd atau lembaga pengarahnya yang mengelirukan kementerian untuk berurus dengan XLW Inc daripada Amerika Syarikat yang tidak wujud, dan telah membayar RM2,264,800 daripada jumlah peruntukan RM5.36 juta gran Tecnofund untuk penyelidikan biofeed.
YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] asks Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation to state what actions have been taken or will be taken against Venturepharm Asia Sdn Bhd or its directors for misleading the Ministry into believing that it was tied up with a company known as XLW Inc from USA, which was non-existent, to grant the Technofund for research into bio-feed totaling RM5.36 million and out of which RM RM2,264,800-00 had been paid to-date?
2. YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] minta Menteri Pelancongan menyatakan sebab pembatalan tender pertama pembinaan pavilion Malaysia di Expo Dunia 2010 di Shanghai, di mana Venturepharm Asia Sdn Bhd (Venturepharm), yang diperbadankan pada Ogos 2005, tidak berserta dan mengapakah dalam tender kedua, Venturepharm yang tidak berpengalaman berkenaan diberikan kontrak bernilai RM20 juta dengan kemungkinan pertambahan (variation order) RM10 juta walaupun terdapat peserta lain yang lebih berpengalaman?
YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] asks the Minister of Tourism to state why, and on what basis, was the first tender for the project to build the Malaysian Pavilion in Shanghai World Expo 2010, which Venturepharm Asia Sdn Bhd (Venturepharm), incorporated in August 2005, did not take part, was cancelled? And when the project was subsequently re-tendered why, and on what basis, was Venturepharm, which had no previous experience in the building industry, was selected against other experienced companies to build the same pavilion costing RM20 million with a possible variation order of RM10 million?
3. YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] minta Menteri Pengangkutan menjelaskan mengapakah Air Asia diberi hak keistimewaan berhutang cukai lapangan terbang (airport tax) RM65 juta (setakat 28-02-2009) yang telah dibayar oleh pelanggan dan apakah tindakan MAHB yang telah diambil terhadap AirAsia untuk mendapatkan bayaran hutang tersebut dan apakah jumlah hutang terkini?
YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] asks the Minister of Transport to state why AirAsia had been given a special privilege to owe airport tax amounting to RM65 million (as at 28-02-2009), which had already been paid by passengers, when other airlines were not accorded a similar privilege; and what actions have MAHB taken or will be taking against AirAsia for the airport tax debt and what is the total current airport tax owed by AirAsia to-date?
4. YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] minta Menteri Wilayah Persekutuan menjelaskan mengapakan tanah GM 3945 / 5537, di Bukit Kiara yang diserahkan kepada DBKL lalu diberi percuma kepada Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan untuk pembinaan masjid dan telah diperuntukan untuk Masjid Desa Sri Hartamas oleh DBKL bawah KL Draft Plan 2020, telah diluluskan oleh DBKL untuk dibangunkan sebagai bangunan komersial Glomac Galleria oleh Glomac Bhd?
YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] asks the Minister of Wilayah Persekutuan to state on what basis was the land known as GM 3945 / 5537 in Bukit Kiara, which was surrendered to DBKL and given free to Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan by DBKL for the sole purpose of building a mosque and the said land was subsequently reserved for Masjid Desa Sri Hartamas by DBKL under the KL Draft Plan 2020, was allowed by DBKL to be developed into a commercial building known as Glomac Galleria by Glomac Bhd?
5. YB Tuan Wee Choo Keong [WANGSA MAJU] minta Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri menyatakan perkembangan terkini kerja penyiasatan polis dan SPRM dalam cadangan-cadangan Suruhjaya Diraja akibat skandal video V.K. Lingam dan adakah dakwaan akan diambil terhadap pihak-pihak yang telah
